Kindergartener Suspended – What’s wrong with this picture?


Recently, I met a six-year-old boy who told me everything I'd ever need to know about carnivorous plants. His eyes sparkled with curiosity and intensity as he excitedly shared his knowledge with dramatic flourishes and scientifically accurate vocabulary. Immediately, I knew this was a gifted child. I also sensed he was an intuitive child, as well. He positively sparkled with energy. What a delight!

Apparently, his school (in the Portland Public School District) doesn't see him quite the same way.

This bright boy's mother is tethered to her cell phone, waiting to answer the frequent calls from the school informing her that her son has been a nuisance and must be taken home. Sometimes it's for the rest of the day. Sometimes they just want her to show her face in the classroom door, which seems to help. Twice, it has meant suspension.

Suspension.

In kindergarten.

Was he fighting? Streaking? Packing a concealed weapon?

No. It was nothing like that.

The first suspension came after he got very frustrated with some work that wasn't perfect (which is typical for gifted kids) and had a huge meltdown. The teacher decided to handle it by calling in the school principal and counselor and taking the rest of the kids out to the playground. At that point, he lost control and threw paper and crayons off the table, knocked over some chairs, and threw pencils at the principal. Suspension.

Of course he blew up. If he's so afraid of failure that he'll throw a fit over not knowing how to write a word, then he's going to feel completely raw and exposed if he's singled out in that manner, with the counselor and the principal coming in and the class being taken outside to the playground. It's a natural stress response - fight or flight. His pattern is to fight. This was high, high stress for him: embarrassment, frustration, humiliation, ostracism, self-loathing, anger ... all of that and more. That's a lot for a little six-year-old to handle. He retreated to the reptilian part of his brain and protected himself in the only way he knew how. The teacher obviously did not possess the skills to diffuse the situation before it escalated and he got stuck in that stress response.

This was not the boy's fault. He's only six. He's gifted, bored, misunderstood by his teacher and principal, and very energetic, to top it all off. This environment wasn't working for him and no one was attempting to change the environment. They were just trying to change the boy. They were completely reactive. If they'd even made a sincere attempt to proactively respect his needs, he would have responded more positively, and the situation would have been averted.

The second suspension followed an overheard conversation with another boy who wanted to do something that the teacher had disallowed. This gifted boy posited that if their teacher died, then they could do whatever they wanted. He wasn't threatening to kill the teacher, and while this line of thinking might be somewhat morbid, it was simply an imaginative child exploring the ideas of freedom and power. The teacher sent him immediately to the office, and the principal, interpreting the story to mean that he was threatening the teacher, issued a TWO DAY suspension.

After picking him up from school and discussing the matter with him, his mother determined this suspension to be unreasonable. After all, he had recently explored the same line of thinking at home, imagining he could eat candy and watch movies all day if she died, and they had not given it a second thought. When his mother called and made her case to the school, the teacher admitted that she'd just had a really trying day and had no patience left, and the principal admitted to not having accurate information. They shortened it to a one day suspension.

What kind of message is this school sending to both this boy and his mother? The family is seeking counseling, assuming there is something terribly wrong with their child and their parenting. This gifted child is learning to see himself in a certain negative light that will influence all future school experiences. It's not okay for schools to do this to our children and families.

Why is he so frustrated at school?

Well, for starters, he's bored out of his gourd. He's academically ready to tackle things far more complex than what is being offered, even though he seems to give up easily on some of the simpler tasks. This is typical of gifted children. If they can't do it perfectly the first time, there is huge frustration unless they have an understanding and patient person helping them learn to value their effort rather than the result. Gifted children (and intuitive children, for that matter) abhor repetitive and meaningless busy work. If it doesn't have depth and relevance for them, they will find other ways of entertaining themselves.

My suggestion: Training in gifted education

With so many intuitive and gifted children in our schools nowadays, it is crucial to have teachers trained in gifted education. And this is NOT so they can learn how to do fun projects with the GATE kids in a separate room. It is so they can identify and understand gifted children and how their brains process information. So much talent and potential is being wasted because their frustrations are being mistaken as learning disabilities, attention problems, or behavior issues. When their needs are understood and met, in most cases these problems disappear.

Why does he feel so disempowered?

An otherwise sweet and loving child who is fantasizing about the freedom he'd have if all of the authority figures in his life were to die is not psychotic. He is simply feeling disempowered. Intuitive children have enormous personal power, and if not given appropriate outlets to express that power, it can burst out in the form of behaviors that adults generally don't like. For an intuitive kindergartener, being made to sit still and quiet for long periods of time is just asking for some sort of inappropriate energetic burst. So is being expected to start or stop a particular kind of work at a particular time that feels arbitrary to the child, or doing work that seems irrelevant - in other words, most of the day in the life of a kindergartener these days.

My suggestion: More freedom, choice, and physical activity

This energy and power needs expression in positive ways, like more time to run and play freely and more choice in how they spend their time at school. Most public schools are not set up to meet those needs. Recesses are shorter and fewer. PE has been reduced or cut. Most of the children's work requires sitting. Days are chunked into small parcels of time so all of the required subjects can be crammed into each day, and those parcels are all determined by the teacher, or in some cases, the administration. Rarely are they decided by the students.

Outside of school, some positive outlets would be plenty of time for daydreaming and imaginative play, and lots of self-directed physical activity. Over-scheduling with sports and extracurricular activities will backfire because the scheduling will feel constrictive. One outside activity of their own choosing would be plenty, as long as it doesn't hog all their free time. Television should be avoided. This topic is a whole other post, but for now, just trust me on this. Brain imaging technology has proven that it really does, literally, rot the brain. Think of it this way: for a power-hungry child, how is passively sitting and watching a screen going to satisfy their need to express their power? Video games should also be avoided, but for the opposite reason. They give kids a false sense of too much power, which is very addictive for intuitive kids. Both modes of screen time are simply wasting an opportunity for them to be masters of their own world.

What is the alternative?

Luckily, there are many alternative schools cropping up that beautifully meet the needs of intuitive and gifted kids. Any school that describes itself as a Reggio Emilia, constructivist, or Waldorf school is a great place for these kiddos! Waldorf schools are amazing and magical places of deep, well-rounded learning, but can be rather pricey. Many charter schools (which are free and part of the public school system) are incorporating the Reggio and constructivist philosophies into their charters. I won't go into the details of these school models in this post, but I strongly suggest you Google them to learn more. You'll fall in love! Of course, homeschooling is another great option offering plenty of freedom, self-direction, and empowerment if you're able to make that work in your family.


[Update July 1, 2010: I forgot to mention Montessori as another great alternative! (Thanks, Lisa!) The Montessori classroom is rich with engaging manipulatives that allow children to construct their own learning at their own pace and by their own choice.  Again: empowerment, choice, individualization.  Great stuff!] 

The bottom line …

The bottom line is that if school seems challenging for your intuitive, gifted child, it is more accurate to say that your child's gifts are challenging the school. If the school can't rise to the occasion and fulfill the valid needs of your child, then it's time to expel yourselves and find a place that will respect and honor your child for who they are.




19 comments:

lizzie_fitz June 30, 2010 12:43 AM  

The child i look after, is 8 in a month or so, its been wierd her being 1 and then 2, and then she seemed to stay at 3 for aaaages, and then BAM, EIGHT. shes lovely, cheeky, funny, childlike, but when it comes to school she has no patience for it, its boring, she cant remember what she did that day, shed rather be horse riding or running or exploring or just TALKING to grown ups!
She doesn't mind going into school, she has a problem with the way shes being taught. she sits at the back of the classroom, when she asked to move to the front so she could see (shes eight...) the teacher said ''only clever children get to sit at the front, zara, and you have trouble don't you...'' WHAT?????!!! you do NOT say that kind of thing to a child, ever. ever ever ever. sinse then shes had problems. the school suggested her parents take her for screening for autism, because she doesn't respond the same as the other kids..(her parents don't spend enough good quality time with her, and shout quite a lot) so they took her along, when the psychiatrist suggest she try some tablets to calm her down and keep her focused her parents said they weren't sure, the psychiatrist reassured them by telling them, ''my 6 yo daughter takes them, only in the week, on the weekend she doesn't have to''

oh i wonder why? could it be because you're interacting with her???? she needs REAL stimulation!

its been declared that Zara isn't autistic, or anything at all..they 'just don't know whats wrong with her'.

JESUS!!!!! 50 years ago, people didn't need a psychiatrist to work work out if a child needs more stimulation, or more routine, or less smarties or a puzzle rather than tv. you just parented. you did the best for them. people don't seem to understand children. THEY'RE LITTLE HUMANS!!!! if they're acting up, there might be something wrong with their brain, but don't you think the parents would have noticed it when the child was young?? likelihood is that they're bored, or your not teaching them in a way that's right for them. i had a teacher once who told me if i didn't understand they wern't doing their job properly, and asked around the class for different explanations until i got it.

teach them like they are 18 year olds in training, not like they're hyper animals that we don't understand, or need to sedate, that's the easy way out. if raising kids was supposed to be easy there would be books with real answers in it by now and no one would be terrified by it.

kids need to do things and have a sense of achievement, to work toward a rewarding outcome. sitting them in front of the TV all the time does nothing like this. its puts them into a sleep like state, meaning when they don't watch TV? they're pepped and ready to go.....aaaaalllll the time.

to conclude, im on your side of the fence, Lex, just need to get more of these good learning environments open and more available to all children.

more parenting, less psychiatrists
more interaction, less TV
more stimulation, less tablets
more common sense, less panicking and over-reacting to someone who finds jumping in puddles and jelly wobbling on a plate, highly amusing.

they're children. learning machines. beautiful, funny, eager, learning machines. treat them as such.

love and light
xxxxxx

Julie June 30, 2010 6:22 AM  

oh my god.

I'm horrified. By your story. And even more by the first commenters story. Drugging an 8 yr old, who clearly is going to have self esteem and other issues if that's how her teacher treats her, to say nothing of the parenting, or lack of it at home. Just horrific.

I totally agree with all the remedies you have. I would love to run a programme where children with adhd are treated lovingly and fairly, but with consistent and mindful boundries, fed properly and deprived of TV/video/computer, but given simple well crafted toys, and lots of opportunities for imaginative, physical and outdoor play. I'd be willing to be at least 50% would show marked changes. Which is not to say that there aren't some with genuine behaviour issues, but I believe a significant number are just the victims of a society, and specifically a family who can't or don't have the skills to parent them in a way that gives them the opportunity to develop. Instead they punish inappropriately or drug them when it gets too difficult. I don't know if it makes me more mad, or sad, but whichever, it's not a good thing :-(

Alexis Ahrens June 30, 2010 10:41 AM  

Lizzie ~ So, so sad to hear about your little charge and her nasty teacher. Ditto to everything Julie said in response. On the bright side, she has YOU, and that is a very bright light, indeed. Will her parents respect your perspective on this? I mean, you've been greatly involved in her life for years. They obviously trust you. Are you comfortable talking with them about it?

I admire your passion and deep understanding of children. I know you love the creativity involved in making your corsets and such, but have you ever considered that perhaps you belong in a leadership role with children? They need you. xo

Julie~ I know. Like I said above, ditto to everything you said. Yes, it's true that there are some kids who really do benefit from pharmaceutical intervention, but in all my years of teaching, I can only think of 2 examples where that was the case, and these were boys (it's mostly the boys, poor dears)who were diagnosed as "Seriously Emotionally Disturbed" (SED) along with a whole host of other disorders. These weren't just active or frustrated kids. The meds kept them from hurting others or climbing the bookshelves or hiding in the garbage cans. My point is that only two SERIOUS cases out of hundreds of kids warranted medication. Many more than that were medicated, and I think it was a grave disservice to them and hugely disrespectful.

Again,Julie, there is a bright side here. You, me, Lizzie, all the moms and readers of blogs like this one, all the unschoolers, all the innovative charter schools, the Waldorf schools, the brain scientists and many others are onto this. Together, we are all crying foul to the status quo and schools that damage our children. We are demanding deeper thinking. We are supporting one another to stand up to institutions and question their practices. We ARE changing this, one little bit at a time.

So, share this post and the thoughtful comments you've written. Tweet it, Digg it, Stumble it. Spread the word. Other parents will recognize their children in this post, and perhaps they will think differently about how they approach their schools, their children's teachers, and their children.

Thanks so much for your thoughtful comments, gals.

Cheers!
Alexis

Janice June 30, 2010 2:55 PM  

Hello Alexis: Good timing on this post for me as I've been thinking about schooling for Moses. There's talk about a potential holistic school in my area, but to get it going, they'll need committed parents to help birth this baby. DH and I have committed to being a part of this group, but there's a part of me that's has wondered "why not the local school for Moses". It certainly would be easier, take less commitment, time, energy and less expensive. I think your post has helped to answer that question for me. I have a real desire for Moses to be a part of school that empowers children and recognizes the gifts of each child and allows each child to learn in a way that they naturally learn.

Glad to be a part of an online community too that supports this same line of thinking.

Cheers,
Janice

Stacy (Mama-Om) June 30, 2010 9:04 PM  

Hey Alexis,
Thanks for your comment on my blog... the other thing I was doing this morning during meditation was composing a response to your post!

First, I think you know that I don't think of my kids as gifted, intuitive or highly sensitive, though I think perhaps they are, in just the way that they don't easily conform to mainstream society's expectations of them (AND they have support to follow their own intuition from me)... I am lucky that we homeschool and thus don't have to deal with the brunt of society's expectations, though, as you saw on my blog today, we had quite an experience at a public swim class last night!

Like your other commenters and the parents of this young boy, I think it is a human need to be met wherever we are, to be acknowledged, to have your actions seen in light of positive intent (many people, especially children, are not consciously manipulative or purposefully trying to "push buttons"), to be treated with respect, to trust each one's unfolding, etc. etc.!!

Yesterday, I was at lunch with my sister who is visiting from out of town. A friend of hers also joined us at lunch, and he mentioned, several times, that his five-year-old son was having "behavior problems," telling his mother he hated her, melting down over a toy at the drug store and then running away from his mom, etc. He mentioned black marks, and even said that his son needed to earn his birthday back. I thought he was kidding, but he explained that his behavior needed to improve before they would give him a party. I kept thinking how confused this poor kid is, and of how much pain his parents are in, how much they all love each and how unable they are to live within that love right now. How simple information about what is developmental appropriate and ways of moving through these behaviors while keeping the child's autonomy intact could transform their lives!

Later on, the third time he mentioned the "I hate you" thing, I did share what I say/do when Mica says he doesn't like me... that I affirm the feelings behind the words (he is feeling angry or frustrated)... I think the Dad had a moment of recognition.

Despite stories like the one you share and the one my sister's friend shared, I continue to feel hopeful that more and more people will gain a developmental understanding of children as children and are able to grow their skills as parents/people to create the loving environment we all so desire. I feel it is imperative to surround myself with like-minded folks and to remember how many parents inspire me!!

Alexis Ahrens June 30, 2010 11:07 PM  

Janice ~ I'm so glad this post had an impact on your decision-making about schools for Moses. Though it's a huge commitment to help get a school off the ground, how satisfying to know you made such a difference for not only your son, but many other children, as well. Keep us posted. Sounds great!

Stacy ~ I'm honored that my blog post made it into your morning meditation! I feel sad for your sister's friend's little boy. To have his birthday leveraged against him, poor buddy! Who knows what door you opened for that father with your simple sharing. He needed to hear something. It sounds like they were getting desperate.

I agree with how important it is for us to surround ourselves with like-minded people, and to take solace and inspiration from one another. Thanks so much for your thoughtful contribution!

Cheers!
Alexis

Anonymous July 1, 2010 10:15 AM  

As a mom of a boy who got suspended from kindergarten...I identify with your post! We watched "Where the Wild Things Are" a few weeks ago..and there is a part where Max feels like he is a monster...I wondered if that is how my child felt when every single adult viewed him as a problem child.

Waldorf was also recommended to us, but when I looked into it I was a little unsure how it would work for a gifted kid...The Waldorf schools don't believe in teaching kids to read until they are over 8. How is that going to work for kids that read before kindergarten?

Homeschooling has ended up being the best option for our family. My little "monster" is growing into a fine young man.

Lisa July 1, 2010 12:41 PM  

How awful. Both your story and Lizzie's (and Stacy's too), on many levels, which we've already discussed, so I won't again. I hope the parents were/are able to find another option for him. I think this kind of reaction from the teacher/principal etc. is problematic for all the kids, not just him. I agree with Stacy that it's a human need to be acknowledged, and in that environment it's hard to imagine any of them are. The 'well-behaved' ones have just learned not to expect that, which is sad.

Personally, for my own kids I am not so adamant on the TV/video game stuff, although I know what you are saying. I think a balance can be struck (for some kids anyway), if things are age appropriate, no commercials (so mostly videos), etc. My kids have gotten into some online computer games and I think they are great. There's one all about animals that they love and that's highly interactive. The key is that it's not used as a babysitter, in my mind. I also figure at some point they need to know how to handle media/pop culture, it will always be with us, and if I deny it completely, it will become the 'forbidden fruit'. If I can watch SYTYCD why can't they watch Ni Hao Kai Lan? But for both me and them, it's all about balance.

I have not found many Waldorf schools here in LA, which surprised me, have you where you are? There are some charter schools incorporating constructivist/Emilia stuff. I noticed you didn't mention Montessori, and I was wondering why, since some Indigo organizations recommend either Walforf or Montessori (or used to anyway)?

Alexis Ahrens July 1, 2010 2:08 PM  

Anonymous ~ Thanks for sharing your experience here! I know the Waldorf "not teaching reading until 3rd grade" thing throws a lot of parents off. What I can say about that is that everything they do before then is very rich in literacy development - much more so than in an traditional school. Songs and storytelling are infused into everything, so by the time they actually begin to teach reading in a structured way, most kids fly with it. 3rd grade is a much more developmentally appropriate time to expect most kids to have the mental capacity to decipher the intricacies of the reading code, so to speak. Both of my nieces went to Waldorf schools. Both began reading in third grade, and were quickly (within the year) devouring Harry Potter books with a depth of understanding that you don't typically see among the same aged children taught to read the traditional way. There is so much richness, variety, and depth to the Waldorf curriculum that gifted kids really thrive there. Just some food for thought for you. If you can afford it, it's worth checking into further.

That said, I'm so glad you are able to give your son what he needs in a homeschool environment. How great for him that you are able to do that! Kudos!

Lisa ~ I absolutely agree with you that all kids suffer in those types of classrooms, because if one child isn't being recognized for who he is, then chances are all children are being lumped into broad categories and "dealt with" rather than individually nurtured based on each one's needs.

RE the TV thing - I've even waffled on this, myself. My thought is that, yes, he'll get exposed to plenty of screen time elsewhere, and therefore home can be the place where he can figure out something else to do with his time. Once we got out of the habit of watching it, it rarely occurred to him to think about it.

Kim John Payne, author of Simplicity Parenting, cited some incredible research about the brain and television, using brain imaging technology. In a very unscientific nutshell, there was an inverse correlation between "screen time" and the brain's ability to respond creatively to new stimuli. The less screen time the subjects were exposed to, the more parts of their brain lit up in response to new stimuli, which translated into more curiosity, resilience, and ability to incorporate new learning. The greater the amount of screen time, the fewer lights went on in the brain, translating into fear, fight or flight, and basically lizard brain reactivity to new stimuli.

I know, I watch SYTYCD, too, and maybe it's hypocritical. (BTW, wasn't Alex absolutely amazing last night with Twitch?!!!!) Then again, I'm a grown up, and while brain scientist now know that our brains continue to be elastic our entire lives, I'm still not growing and snipping neural connections at the rapid-fire pace Lucas is.

(Wow - this could have been multiple posts!)

As for Montessori - Thanks for reminding me! That was just an oversight on my part! Yes, Montessori, too! I actually include a write up of them in my book, but forgot about it here. It's easier for it to slip my mind because my knowledge of it is more academic, whereas I have direct experience with Reggio and Waldorf.

We have one Waldorf near us, and one rather new one in North County. I'm surprised you don't have a lot in LA. Though it takes a lot to support one Waldorf school - lots of trained teachers and specialists, lots of parents willing to enroll their kids and support the school financially - I would think LA would have plenty of all of that. Interesting.

Cheers!
Alexis

Alexis Ahrens July 1, 2010 2:09 PM  
This comment has been removed by the author.
Alexis Ahrens July 1, 2010 2:09 PM  
This comment has been removed by the author.
Alexis Ahrens July 1, 2010 2:11 PM  
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous July 1, 2010 6:00 PM  

Alexis,

Thank you for this post and for your incredible insight into Ben. I truly value your knowledge and think Lucas is beyond lucky to have such a wise mother.

I am trying to sort out options for Ben and right now it's hard to imagine changing schools because we truly love our neighborhood school. I also think I would need to consider moving his sister as well because they are so close in age and such great friends that to have them separated at this young age just doesn't feel right.

If money were not an issue and when is that ever the case, we have an excellent Waldorf school in our area. We just need $24,000 a year to send the both of them....

We have two creative science schools and both are on our lottery system for transferring in to them. This is the one avenue where I say to myself if I knew then what I know now....they are great schools from all that I have researched but the deadline for the upcoming year ended last March which was right when our troubles at school with Ben began to escalate. It would never have occurred to me then to think about moving schools but now we're "locked in" for another full school year.

I always feel like I am offering up excuses instead of solutions but in the area of schools it's very restricted here ( and I suppose everywhere) Still, I do feel we can give it our best shot next year.

In the meantime we are doing a lot of rock climbing and swimming this summer and just hanging out and playing.

Ben did end his year positively and I will do everything in my power to help him feel successful in first grade this fall. I do think his teacher adored him as did most of the staff at his school. His principal was the toughest staff member because where his teacher found his behavior and personality completely normal for a 6 year old, the principal did not. She was really insistent that Ben's meltdowns were extreme and significant and yet the rest of the teachers were so quick to assure me that they've seen it all and Ben was to them perfectly normal. Difficult but "normal".

So sigh, I don't know. I will continue to advocate and support Ben and yet now my eyes and ears are far more tuned in and receptive to changing schools and that is the first big step as it will all have to be initiated by me if it is to happen.

Thanks again Lex, I miss you more than I can say. You always have been a wonderful mirror for me.
l

liz from portland

Alexis Ahrens July 1, 2010 8:21 PM  

Lizzie-lou, my dear friend, thanks so much for your permission to share Ben's story. As you can see, it hit a nerve with a lot of people, so you're certainly not alone. Thanks also for sharing your response to the post and your ongoing thoughts as you navigate this tricky path. It's far from easy.

I wouldn't write off Waldorf just yet. For one thing, Waldorf schools all offer flexible tuition based on financial ability to pay. Plus, the second child is far less than full tuition, so it is doubtful that it would cost as much as you're currently thinking. It might be worth it to go check it out, have a conversation with the admissions person and find out the real bottom line.

Any chance Ben's principal is leaving? :)

Since it's looking like he'll be there at least this coming year, you can insist on a teacher with GATE training. Now, usually they don't have GATE classrooms until 3rd grade, but that doesn't mean that there isn't a current 1st grade teacher who has already received certification when he/she was teaching higher grades. It's possible. If no one there is GATE-certified, you can request that you get a teacher who is willing to get GATE training in the beginning of the year. Seriously, I would have done this for a student if a parent requested it! You absolutely deserve to ask. Doesn't sound like the principal will understand or be terribly supportive of this idea, but still, this is stretching you to be stronger than you've ever been before.

I am really touched by your closing words, Liz. They mean so much to me! I love you lots, my forever-friend!

Dear readers, do you have any other suggestions for Liz if she has to keep Ben at this same school for the time being? I'm sure she'd appreciate the support and ideas.

Cheers!
Alexis

Anonymous July 1, 2010 9:16 PM  

Thanks for this post. We can identify with this scenario over here - almost verbatim the same experience with my dd5. To answer a commenter above, we've turned to a Waldorf/public hybrid, and it's working great. The absence of pure academics is perfect since she can already read, write, and do math two years above her grade level. Being drilled in that at K level was a living hell. Now she engages in community building, arts and crafts, dramatic arts, storytelling, cooking, nature studies, and plenty of outdoor play. She went from almost exactly the scenario in the article to thrilled with school within a couple of months.

We'll keep her in the Waldorf hybrid school until the public gifted program is available in grade 4, then give her that choice. We're also considering an extracurricular gifted math program to supplement the Waldorf since this is available through the local chess club her brother is in.

I had also read the warnings against Waldorf for gifted, but in our experience for very young bright children who are highly active and emotionally sensitive it can definitely work. In addition to the emphasis on kinesthetic learning, they create a peaceful classroom environment and a deeper emotional connection with the teacher and the community. Two thumbs up from here!

Anonymous July 1, 2010 9:45 PM  

P.S.

Liz: Portland, OR, I'm assuming?

http://www.portlandvillageschool.org/whoAreWe

This sounds very similar to the school dd5 is attending.

Erika (anon just above - I meant to sign it!)

Alexis Ahrens July 2, 2010 10:55 AM  

Erika ~ Thanks so much for the resource for Liz and for sharing your story! It's so helpful for other parents to see how a terrible situation was turned around, and to know that there are alternatives that will make THE WORLD OF DIFFERENCE for their children. I so appreciate your comments!!

Cheers!
Alexis

Carolee July 2, 2010 12:33 PM  

Wow - so many similar stories to what we went through with our son several years ago. We pulled him out of public school 3/4 of the way through 3rd grade after years of trying to force him to fit in the little box they provide. He was written up for physical assault in 1st grade after a little girl walked into his Power Rangers demonstration (facts verified by the coach who saw it happen). Then he was told if he was sent to the principal's office one more time they would make a phone call and a bus would come take him to the school for bad boys. He kept this information to himself for weeks and then was hysterical when he was sent to the office again. He was in private pre-k and kinder, which sounded like a great idea, but put him ahead when we put him in public school. I'm not one of those moms who says "my kid is gifted", but where we lived at the time the bar wasn't very high! He was bored to tears. We did a charter school for 2nd grade, which was somewhat better, but the administration was very intolerant of kids who didn't sit quietly with their hands folded on their desk... By the time we pulled him out of 3rd he had completely lost his passion for learning and was convinced that he was stupid and a bad boy. We've homeschooled and now unschooled for five years. We have a wonderful support group and he has many great friends who are free to be themselves. We're very blessed to be able to do this. My heart breaks for your friend and her little boy. I truly hope they find a workable situation.

Alexis Ahrens July 2, 2010 1:07 PM  

Yet another great testimonial from a brave mom who made some smart choices for her son! Thanks so much, Carolee, for sharing here. This is becoming quite the collection of support stories for parents going through similar pain.
Cheers!
Alexis

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Comments

Followers

Blog Archive

Search

Loading...